Even though the editors and at least one major consumer handle the tagging the way I mentioned, and not centre_turn_lane=*? FryIsNotSureIfSerious.jpg
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Tristan Anderson < [email protected]> wrote: > In that case the developers at Osmand have some work to do. > > All we do is provide the data. Individual consumers can choose whether > they want to use it. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Paul Johnson <[email protected]> > *Sent:* February 19, 2017 6:24 AM > *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] Center turning lanes: centre_turn_lane=yes > method vs. lanes:both_ways method > > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Tristan Anderson < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I've always used >> >> >> lanes=5 >> >> centre_turn_lane=yes >> >> >> as a shortcut that implies >> >> >> lanes=5 >> lanes:forward=2 >> lanes:both_ways=1 >> lanes:backward=2 >> turn:lanes:both_ways=left >> >> It's just a way to reduce five tags to two in a common, special-case >> situation. Lanes can be any odd number greater than one. >> > > I'm not sure of any data consumers that would assume that shorthand. I > know Osmand correctly recognizes the latter, but would not parse the > former. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
