2017-03-03 14:36 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kenny <[email protected]>:
> Oops - I thought I'd copied and pasted the link, honest! > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436809818 > > I'm not yet trying for 2.5d - without topography, that'll give quite odd > results. > you're already doing some 2.5d, the amount of building:levels ;-) Yes, this looks like I expected, these situations are not well rendered in carto-osm, unless you "help" the renderer by adding the covered tag to the covered section. Here's an example I remember: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23635726 but it doesn't look nice at the moment, if I don't recall wrong this was rendered a tad better some time ago (due to the primary having round line ends they extend beyond the actual line end and make the covered section almost disappear). Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
