covered=yes is exactly what I was looking for, thanks! On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected] > wrote:
> > 2017-03-03 14:36 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kenny <[email protected]>: > >> Oops - I thought I'd copied and pasted the link, honest! >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436809818 >> >> I'm not yet trying for 2.5d - without topography, that'll give quite odd >> results. >> > > > you're already doing some 2.5d, the amount of building:levels ;-) > Yes, this looks like I expected, these situations are not well rendered in > carto-osm, unless you "help" the renderer by adding the covered tag to the > covered section. > Here's an example I remember: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23635726 > but it doesn't look nice at the moment, if I don't recall wrong this was > rendered a tad better some time ago (due to the primary having round line > ends they extend beyond the actual line end and make the covered section > almost disappear). > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
