I think I'd chime in with the people who are saying that the tag is quite subjective, except that I can think of a few cases where it isn't: http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/For-hikers-no-clean-laundry-in-Kent- 4738977.php#item-38493 in particular comes to mind. But in the absence of signage like http://ww3.hdnux.com/photos/23/21/50/5052950/3/1024x1024.jpg or http://www.trailgallery.com/photos/7710/tj7710_062808_094103_350541.jpg, I'd avoid placing any such tag.
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04-Mar-17 09:59 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > >> On 03/03/2017 04:56 PM, Warin wrote: >> >>> Would I use friendly:*=no ... yes. There is one pub/fuel stop in >>> Australia that is 'out of fuel' for motorcyclists ... but has it for >>> cars. >>> Definitely friendly:motorcycle=no! Very usefull to know that a >>> motorcycle needs enough fuel to get to the next fuel stop! >>> >> How can this be? At least here in the US, cars and motorcycles run on >> the same stuff. >> >> > Personal bias by the operators. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
