On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Tom Pfeifer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 08.03.2017 00:01, Johan C wrote: > >> > >> make sure the requirements for navigational devices like OSMAND should > >> also be met > > > > > > I don't think OsmAnd would have a problem with the node being at the > > physical separation, in particular if the turn:lanes are tagged > correctly. > > OsmAnd will give advance advice to turn and display the lanes to use. > > While OsmAnd might show the turn lanes on time, it does announce the > distance to the split as the distance to the exit-node. It does not > inform you about the need to be in the right lane based on a (long) > solid line of several hundred meters > As Paul Johnson wrote, the change:lanes tag is useful in such cases, > but OsmAnd does not know about it. Yet! Don't tag for any specific data consumer, tag what's on the ground in situations like this.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
