sent from a phone



sent from a phone
> On 1. May 2017, at 12:37, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Do not falsely conflate "complex" with "worse". You original complaint
> was, in effect, that there was a lack of complexity, now you complain
> that there is.



no, my main concern is that both have different scope, and that people are 
modifying wikidata without looking at the use of osm tags. 



> 
>> You have to follow a lot of links and definitions and there
>> are many dependencies, everything is connected:
> 
> It's called "linked data" for a reason.


yes, but it makes it completely impractical for osm users to use it as 
definitions for their tags. We should have something concise, not too long, and 
not self contradicting. Not a web of self contradicting possibilities with 
endless texts in different languages which aren't consistent between them.


> 
>> if the meaning of a property is modified this will actually modify
>> a huge lot of objects that use this property.
> 
> Do you have examples of the meanings of properties being modified,
> such that things were broken in this way? Or is this mere FUD?
> 
>> E.g. place in osm is orthogonal to administrative entities, in wikidata
>> it is not. Add a property/"instance of" to the wikidata town object like
>> "administrative territorial entity" and you changed all towns.
> 
> If someone made such a ridiculous change, they would be reverted. This is FUD.



rather than calling my arguments FUD, you should have a look at wikidata. I 
don't write out of nothing about these issues, or because I hate structured 
information. I was very interested in wikidata at first, but the more I'm 
exploring it and following links after links, the more I have become reluctant 
that it is in any usable state or even ever will be - besides synchronizing 
some numbers between different languages and similar.

The entity "town" ALREADY IS an administrative territorial entity in wikidata, 
and nobody has reverted it: https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3957
At least since 2014, and a lot of people have "automatically patrolled" it 
since then, whatever that means, (likely it has nothing to do with a human 
verification of content plausibility)

Cheers,
Martin 
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to