Please read e.g.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clothes_shop
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boutique

Does your reply mean we can remove the word boutique from the English
dictionary ?

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02-Sep-17 04:31 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>>
>> Is ignoring what the community did so far, a guideline ? People have
>> used the tag boutique. So why cannot we take this practice and use
>> that as the guideline ? Why change the currently used tags, causing a
>> cost of all involved parties ?
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a serious question. I want to understand why people think the
>> about differences are ok, but clothes and boutique not.
>
>
> I lack the understanding of what is meant by 'boutique' and 'fashion'.
>
> I think the terms could be used for a very wide variety of features.
>
> The tag shop=cloths I understand and don't see any confusion over it.
>
> If 'fashion' simply means cloths with some added parameters then I would
> think it should be a sub tag. The same for 'boutique'.
>
> If they mean something different from cloths .. then what are they? And I
> don't want terms like - more expensive, finer materials, better design -
> these are either subjective and/or sub tags.
>
> Fuel stations that do not sell diesel are not given a separate main tag -
> they get a sub tag.
> And yes some things in OSM have been given main tags where, with more
> organisation, they could have been better with sub tags. 'Path' and footpath
> spring to mind.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to