How about access=private and access:stranger=permit? However, military=* and access=private seems to conflict as military zone implies specific access rules.
20-09-2017 21:39 tarihinde Kevin Kenny yazdı: > > If details of permit administration are observable on the ground, we > can work out ways to map them. In the common situation that I have > observed around me (and I've seen it with properties belonging to New > York State, several municipal governments, Nature Conservancy, Open > Space Institute, and several private conservancies), the common > phrasing on signs is: 'Access by permit only. For information contact: > [...]' (as opposed to the 'POSTED: No Trespassing' that denotes > access=private). Since what is ordinarily visible on the ground is the > signage forbidding unpermitted access (but implying that permission is > routinely granted), that's the information that I propose to map. > Since ordinarily I do NOT see details of the permit regime in the > field, I do not propose any sort of schema for permit administration > at the present time. > > Is this a minimal proposal that we can all tolerate? Yours, faithfully Erkin Alp _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
