Ok. Now I understand it. Thanks. El 28/9/2017 17:04, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <[email protected]> escribió:
> > > 2017-09-28 16:50 GMT+02:00 marc marc <[email protected]>: > >> Hello, >> >> Le 28. 09. 17 à 16:32, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : >> > I prefer the generic solution (node relation) over a specific device >> > solution, which still doesn't allow for more details (different >> > properties, layering order, etc.) >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:devices >> devices describe that there are many times the same element, >> so it is no additional tag needed to describe >> the differences between elements since they are identical. > > > > yes, you can only describe "devices" and only identical ones. If voltage > or phases or anything else were different (see https://wiki.openstreetmap. > org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dtransformer#Tagging ) you won't be able to tag it > with this shortcut. If they are identical, it is a nice way to save work. > Not sure how often it would be useful, i.e. if the effort to support it and > the added complexity by introducing it, are justified by its usefulness. > > For steps we have the tag "step_count", maybe a simple "transformer_count" > would be an alternative? > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
