sent from a phone
> On 29. Sep 2017, at 17:24, Kevin Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: > > There are basically three possibilities: > > (1) An area object tagged as one of these facilities is presumed to represent > the boundaries of the grounds, unless explicitly tagged as a building. > > (2) An area object tagged as of these facilities is presumed to represent > a building unless tagged building=no. > > (3) There is no guidance on how the facility object relates to the building. > > I strongly favour (1): I’m either for 1 or 3, but prefer in many cases to have distinct objects for the building and its occupants/users, because it removes the ambiguity to which object the properties belong, e.g. name, start_date, wikipedia, architect, operator, ref, etc. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
