You're right, I missed this point.
I've made some searches, the actual sentence of the wiki has been pu in
February 2017
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:tourism%3Dhotel&oldid=1432264)
but if you look at the previous revision it was a little bit different:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:tourism%3Dhotel&oldid=1428557
Wiki user Geozeisig has completely changed the sentence "How to map"
section. I did not check all revisions nor the reasons/discussions for
each changes. I don't like the Geozeisig change on this point.
Whatever I'm in favor of having a consistent hospital, hotel, school...
mapping system.
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
Le 29/09/2017 à 17:11, Bryan Housel a écrit :
If you draw a “Hotel” in iD, you’ll see that it gets a `building=yes`
tag added to it.
(Users can change this if they like).
Again, this is exactly in agreement with what the osm wiki page for
`tourism=hotel` says to do.
On Sep 29, 2017, at 11:06 AM, LeTopographeFou
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
This is how iD interprets the tag - as a building outline.
I disagree, when you look for "Hotel" iD proposes both "Hotel" (in
gray which means it is an area in the iD codes) and "Building Hotel"
(in red and with a building picture which both means it is a
building). Same for Hospitals. For me iD is already ready.
But one may propose a new translation to replace "Hotel" by "Hotel
Grounds" to be consistent with how hospitals are proposed in iD.
By the way this is how I tag hotels now so +1 with the proposal.
Yours,
LeTopographeFou
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
