On 29.09.2017 17:18, Bryan Housel wrote:
AFAIK (from memory) the notable exceptions are schools/universities, hospitals, gas stations, and
power substations.
There is no reason to treat that as exception, vice versa, if any facility has a campus, the tag
describing the facility belongs on the campus, not just a building.
On Sep 29, 2017, at 11:02 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]
On 29. Sep 2017, at 16:50, Bryan Housel <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
So if we collectively decide to change `tourism=*` tags to be property outlines (like hospitals
and schools),
+1, I’d see it like this for all “functions”, regardless of the key (amenity, man_made, tourism,
shop, historic, etc.)
Yes, in particular I was tagging the campus on hotels, on amenity=community_centre and
amenity=social_facility, for the latter the typical example is the garden around the nursing_home.
On 29.09.2017 17:24, LeTopographeFou wrote:
> Wiki user Geozeisig has completely changed the sentence "How to map" section.
I did not check all
> revisions nor the reasons/discussions for each changes. I don't like the Geozeisig change on this
point.
Indeed Geozeisig removed the detailed description of campus mapping from the wiki page, and I agree
that was wrong.
On 29.09.2017 19:16, Mark Wagner wrote:
> It's reasonable to map a hotel as any of
> 1) A point [...]
> 2) A building [...]
> 3) An area [...]
Fully agree.
tom
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
