Hi, Proposed building:material:concrete values aren't actual material but how facades are built. building:material should be used to precise which type of material is used only. A structure=* key is intended to give more information about... structure (what a surprise).
Additionnaly, I think that building:material definition is akward and can be confusing since it only regards facades. Internal building structure aren't often available for domestic housing, but can be found for biggest skyscrappers. Then, building:material should be kept for internal material and facade:material may be used for facades like roof:material. Then building:structure, roof:structure, facade:structure... I know it's a big change compared to the keys usage and the discussed proposal here. But I don't see any tagging consistency for now. All the best *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux> 2017-10-20 22:10 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 20. Oct 2017, at 11:57, Петров Дмитрий <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Addition tag for building:material=concrete, which will allow to specify > type of concrete facade covering of the building: panels, blocks or > monolith. > > > +1, indeed for concrete buildings it is interesting to know whether they > are produced on site or assembled from prefabricated pieces. This is not > limited to the facade though, also applies to structure, roof, floors, > walls, etc. > > Cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
