David, hi, just an thought - could you combine the rationale and examples sections? The way you have it now is first you describe each concept, and afterwards you have the same concept but with a picture. I think it would be better to list each variant with the picture right away.
Thanks! On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:30 AM David Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, there. > > Almost 3 weeks passed and only 3 people told that they preferred karst=yes > instead of karstic=yes. As the first one was also the one stated as the > proposal, and the second one was only mentioned in erroneous examples, I > assume this relative unanimity is enough to confirm karst=yes as the one to > use, and will create the wiki page accordingly. Thanks to all who voted; > the proposal process is now fully finished, apart from creating all the > Wiki pages. > > Regards. > > > Le 24 oct. 2017 à 19:16, David Marchal <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hello, there. > > The vote period passed, and the proposal received a total of 16 approvals, > 1 spoilt vote and 0 refusals, so I closed the vote and marked the proposal > as approved. Thanks to all the voters; I’ll create the according Wiki pages > and edit existing ones to reflect the vote on the following days. > > As a side note, there is a secondary vote on the proposal page; indeed, > some voters noticed an inconsistency in the proposal, ie. a proposal > example carried karstic=yes tagging instead of the proposed karst=yes. To > make sure of what version the voters approved, I have to ask them to go > back on the proposal page and vote, in the dedicated subsection, amongst > karstic=yes or karst=yes. Once the choice will have been asserted, I’ll be > able to create the corresponding Wiki page. > > Thanking you for your patience, and awaiting your votes, > > Regards. > > Le 8 oct. 2017 à 09:51, David Marchal <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hello, there. > > The normal voting duration passed, but there are not enough votes yet to > approve or reject the proposal, so I extend the voting period by two weeks > to allow latecomers to vote. > > Awaiting your votes, > > Reagrds. > > Le 26 sept. 2017 à 20:26, David Marchal <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hello, there. > > As this proposal has been RFCed more than 2 weeks ago, and that comments > have been addressed, I’m now putting it on vote. Please go on the proposal > page ( > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sinkholes_refinement) > to vote. > > Awaiting your votes, > > Regards. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
