Hi, Yuri. Though I understand your request and find it relevant, I’m unsure about altering a proposal page after the vote had started; AFAIK, I’m supposed to let it as is, apart from the vote section. Could you show me if my assumption is wrong, or can someone on the ML confirm or infirm that?
Awaiting your answers, Regards. Le 12 nov. 2017 à 21:17, Yuri Astrakhan <yuriastrak...@gmail.com<mailto:yuriastrak...@gmail.com>> a écrit : David, hi, just an thought - could you combine the rationale and examples sections? The way you have it now is first you describe each concept, and afterwards you have the same concept but with a picture. I think it would be better to list each variant with the picture right away. Thanks! On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:30 AM David Marchal <pene...@live.fr<mailto:pene...@live.fr>> wrote: Hello, there. Almost 3 weeks passed and only 3 people told that they preferred karst=yes instead of karstic=yes. As the first one was also the one stated as the proposal, and the second one was only mentioned in erroneous examples, I assume this relative unanimity is enough to confirm karst=yes as the one to use, and will create the wiki page accordingly. Thanks to all who voted; the proposal process is now fully finished, apart from creating all the Wiki pages. Regards. Le 24 oct. 2017 à 19:16, David Marchal <pene...@live.fr<mailto:pene...@live.fr>> a écrit : Hello, there. The vote period passed, and the proposal received a total of 16 approvals, 1 spoilt vote and 0 refusals, so I closed the vote and marked the proposal as approved. Thanks to all the voters; I’ll create the according Wiki pages and edit existing ones to reflect the vote on the following days. As a side note, there is a secondary vote on the proposal page; indeed, some voters noticed an inconsistency in the proposal, ie. a proposal example carried karstic=yes tagging instead of the proposed karst=yes. To make sure of what version the voters approved, I have to ask them to go back on the proposal page and vote, in the dedicated subsection, amongst karstic=yes or karst=yes. Once the choice will have been asserted, I’ll be able to create the corresponding Wiki page. Thanking you for your patience, and awaiting your votes, Regards. Le 8 oct. 2017 à 09:51, David Marchal <pene...@live.fr<mailto:pene...@live.fr>> a écrit : Hello, there. The normal voting duration passed, but there are not enough votes yet to approve or reject the proposal, so I extend the voting period by two weeks to allow latecomers to vote. Awaiting your votes, Reagrds. Le 26 sept. 2017 à 20:26, David Marchal <pene...@live.fr<mailto:pene...@live.fr>> a écrit : Hello, there. As this proposal has been RFCed more than 2 weeks ago, and that comments have been addressed, I’m now putting it on vote. Please go on the proposal page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sinkholes_refinement) to vote. Awaiting your votes, Regards. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
