On 19.01.2018 19:37, marc marc wrote:
Le 19. 01. 18 à 14:40, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit :
There are religious places that are not for any specific religion
I would expect that religion=multifaith is used for the first purpose.
in this case, why adding a "fake" religious ? if it's not related to a
specific religion, don't add a specific religion value :)
imho religion=multifaith is a mistake.
No I don't see it as a mistake. It is not a fake religion, it is an unambiguous catchword. "multi*"
is used in OSM for facilities that serve an unspecific number of different purposes, sport=multi is
another example.
For the religion case, it was discussed on this list already [1].
religion=multifaith is used already nearly 400x, Mateusz was not proposing it, he was just about to
refine the definition.
There may be also place used by some set of religions.
I would expect that ;-separated list would be used for the second
purpose.
; separation is not mentioned at all at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion
all tag in osm could use ";" as separator.
not sure it's needed to copy/past the same sentence everywhere.
but I'm not against it.
There are some cases with 2-3 dedicated religions where the semicolon system is already being used.
They are as rare as such institutions are. Clarifying this specific situation does not mean to copy
that everywhere.
if these cases are frequent, another solution is to use the system
religion:value=yes/no
Apparently they are infrequent, thus semicolon is better than value-keys.
From my perspective, Mateusz, go ahead as you said.
--
tom
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2015-January/020862.html
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
