Hello, Le 19. 01. 18 à 22:04, Tom Pfeifer a écrit : > On 19.01.2018 19:37, marc marc wrote: >> Le 19. 01. 18 à 14:40, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : >>> There are religious places that are not for any specific religion >>> I would expect that religion=multifaith is used for the first purpose. >> >> in this case, why adding a "fake" religious ? if it's not related to a >> specific religion, don't add a specific religion value :) >> imho religion=multifaith is a mistake. > > No I don't see it as a mistake. It is not a fake religion, it is an > unambiguous catchword. "multi*" is used in OSM for facilities that serve > an unspecific number of different purposes, sport=multi is another example.
"multi" is not the same as "any/all" ! If I am looking for a cemetery for the A religion, I can do a query overpass with religion=A or religion=any. the locations found will match my request. but you can't do anything with multi. maybe the place matches, maybe the place doesn't match. so I still believe that using "multi" for "any" is a mistake. and in the case where multi actually means "more than one", it would be best to encode the 2-3 religions in question so that the data could be used. otherwise multi look like as "several, but I didn't encode the detail so you don't know, go see for yourself", this doesn't provide any additional information about the absence of religion tag. Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
