On 22.01.2018 17:25, Fernando Trebien wrote: > - sett: hewn stones with flat top (...) [2] (...)> - cobblestone: hewn stones > with slightly arched top (...) images [3] and [4]
I don't believe requiring mappers to make a distinction between these two is a good idea. Let's look at your images: > [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/e/ec/Dscf1641-800.jpg > [3] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/68/Kasseien.jpg > [4] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bf/Guzow-oryszew_road_cm03.jpg If I read your mail correctly, you suggest that [3] and [4] belong in the same category, while [2] is a fundamentally different surface type. But when I look at these, [2] and [3] feel a lot more similar to each other than [4] is to either of them. Yours, Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
