Hi Marc, I did send an RFC, over a year ago: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-September/030270.html
Caused some positive comments on the discussion page and quite some people actually using the tag. As for the text on the proposal page itself: I intended it for the audience here. I agree that the tag description for a general mappers' audience needs to be different. (Not very familiar with the proposal habits.) I promise to draft a better tag page after voting ;-) Helge >marc marc marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com wrote: >Wed Jan 24 10:04:39 UTC 2018 > >Hello, > >Le 24. 01. 18 à 10:42, Helge Fahrnberger a écrit : >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Piste:type%3Dconnection >> I'd like to start voting > >you forget to make a request for comment :) >end end date look wrong (January <> February) >my comment : the definition is strange. >"mainly for routing purposes" is not a definition, it's a usecase. >Maybe definition should be like : >"ways taken by skiers to go from one lift to another or >from one lift to another at the beginning of the piste." > >Regards,
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
