On 25-Jan-18 05:53 AM, Helge Fahrnberger wrote:
Hi Marc,
I did send an RFC, over a year ago:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-September/030270.html
Caused some positive comments on the discussion page and quite some
people actually using the tag.
As for the text on the proposal page itself: I intended it for the
audience here. I agree that the tag description for a general mappers'
audience needs to be different. (Not very familiar with the proposal
habits.) I promise to draft a better tag page after voting ;-)
If you change the tag .. then what are 'we' voting on?
Get the proposal well defined .. it has been in 'comments' for years ..
so why was it not improved during that time?
There were no changes from September 2016 to Jan 2018.
Looks to me like not many people here have an interest in this.
But in principle - if voted as an 'approved' tag then there should be no
basic changes to the meanings.
So the description should be very good before voting is requested, not
changed afterwards to something the voters have no say in.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
