bus route relations can get very complexe if they are not ordered. I order them to make sure I haven't missed anything
On Thu, May 3, 2018, 11:28 AM Yves, <[email protected]> wrote: > Un-ordered route members make it very hard to detect a broken route. > Best practice : > 1. If you edit a route, order it at best and check if you haven't broken > it. > 2. If you find an unordered route, order it, check if broken and try to > repair it. > > Use for instance http://ra.osmsurround.org/. > Yves > > Le 3 mai 2018 17:05:32 GMT+02:00, Michael Andersen <[email protected]> a écrit > : >> >> I regularly edit a number of cycle routes (primarily the danish national >> cycleroutes) and do my best to sort/order the members (it's helpfull when >> looking for gaps and other peculiarities in JOSM), but have found that it's >> often near impossible to make them perfectly sorted. >> >> Consider for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20828. Where's >> the >> end points here? >> >> Also note that inexperienced mappers doing minor edits somewhere along a >> route >> cannot be expected to reorder it. >> >> On torsdag den 3. maj 2018 07.38.04 CEST Tod Fitch wrote: >> >>> While I’ve mapped a number of trails most of them are not part of a >>> designated larger route so I am not 100% sure, but I think hiking routes >>> are much like highway routes: The ways in the relation should be ordered. >>> >>> Not sure why you’d need a node in there, especially without an explicit >>> role. If the route ways are ordered it is obvious where the end points are. >>> >>> Cheers! >>> >>> On May 3, 2018, at 5:06 AM, David Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, there. >>>> >>>> I recently worked a bit on hiking routes, and noticed that some routes >>>> have unordered members. That's particularly noticeable on >>>> waymarkedtrails.org <http://waymarkedtrails.org/>, as it makes the >>>> elevation graph rubbish and useless. I read the relation:route wiki page, >>>> but there is only advice regarding stops order, and not way members >>>> order. Shouldn't there be a note on this page regarding the importance of >>>> sorting the ways to have a more useful relation than only spaghettis? >>>> >>>> By the way, I saw some hiking relations having a node without explicit >>>> role, seemingly as a start point; is it a generally accepted, used >>>> feature, or only an idiosyncrasy? >>>> >>>> Awaiting your answers, >>>> >>>> Regards. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >>>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> > Yves > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
