I have ordered a few bus, train, cycling and walking routes.
In principle:
Both bus and train routes need to be ordered in version 2 of public transport
(both stop positions and ways need to be ordered from start to finish).
Cycling and walking routes should be ordered for correct interpretation by data
users.
On 04/05/18 04:13, James wrote:
bus route relations can get very complexe if they are not ordered. I
order them to make sure I haven't missed anything
On Thu, May 3, 2018, 11:28 AM Yves, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Un-ordered route members make it very hard to detect a broken route.
Best practice :
1. If you edit a route, order it at best and check if you haven't
broken it.
2. If you find an unordered route, order it, check if broken and
try to repair it.
Use for instance http://ra.osmsurround.org/.
Yves
Le 3 mai 2018 17:05:32 GMT+02:00, Michael Andersen <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
I regularly edit a number of cycle routes (primarily the danish national
cycleroutes) and do my best to sort/order the members (it's helpfull
when
looking for gaps and other peculiarities in JOSM), but have found that
it's
often near impossible to make them perfectly sorted.
Consider for examplehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20828.
Where's the
end points here?
Also note that inexperienced mappers doing minor edits somewhere along
a route
cannot be expected to reorder it.
On torsdag den 3. maj 2018 07.38.04 CEST Tod Fitch wrote:
While I’ve mapped a number of trails most of them are not
part of a designated larger route so I am not 100% sure,
but I think hiking routes are much like highway routes:
The ways in the relation should be ordered. Not sure why
you’d need a node in there, especially without an explicit
role. If the route ways are ordered it is obvious where
the end points are. Cheers!
On May 3, 2018, at 5:06 AM, David Marchal
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello, there. I recently worked a bit on hiking
routes, and noticed that some routes have unordered
members. That's particularly noticeable on
waymarkedtrails.org <http://waymarkedtrails.org>
<http://waymarkedtrails.org/>, as it makes the
elevation graph rubbish and useless. I read the
relation:route wiki page, but there is only advice
regarding stops order, and not way members order.
Shouldn't there be a note on this page regarding the
importance of sorting the ways to have a more useful
relation than only spaghettis? By the way, I saw some
hiking relations having a node without explicit role,
seemingly as a start point; is it a generally
accepted, used feature, or only an idiosyncrasy?
Awaiting your answers, Regards.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
