The Oxford does not make that distiction. Generally, barn and shed are about what the building looks like. That would be consistent with building=*. The usage or function of the building is a much more fleeting attribute, which should imho be tagged separately.
Verzonden vanaf mijn Samsung Galaxy-smartphone. -------- Oorspronkelijk bericht --------Van: Volker Schmidt <[email protected]> Datum: 04-05-18 10:52 (GMT+01:00) Aan: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <[email protected]> Onderwerp: Re: [Tagging] Mapping generic sheds The problem is that (British) English does not have a word for a generic animal-stable. "stable" is for horses. "cow shed" is for bovines, "pigsty" for pigs. In the US a "barn" may include animal sheltering, but not in UK-English. On 4 May 2018 at 09:39, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: sent from a phone On 4. May 2018, at 07:23, marc marc <[email protected]> wrote: building=farm_auxiliary farm_auxiliary:architecture=shed/* this combination makes no sense. building value is about appearance. so if the appearance is a shed, then building=shed +1, also building=stable or building=pigsty etc. would be ok farm_auxiliary:function=sheeps;cows;horses;* or building:usage ? but a cow is not a usage, nor a function. for animal related features there is the key “animal”, the most used value is “yes” https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/animal#valuesits wiki page suggests keys like cat=yes etc https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animals IMHO for a pigsty pigs would be implicit. building=farm_auxiliary is a more generic “I don’t know it well, but it’s part of a farm and not a residential building”-tag. I would prefer more specific building values if you do know better. cheers,Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
