2018-05-11 1:48 GMT+02:00 Warin <[email protected]>: > On 11/05/18 09:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > i.e. it is forbidden to cross the parking by foot if you are not disabled? > > and if an area is tagged amenity=parking, access=customers ... same > problem. >
while it is somehow true, it is less of a practical problem, because anyone is a potential customer. You don't have to actually buy something on order to be a "customer" for the question of access. If I were to define rendering rules, I would generally allow access to access=customers entities and would clearly not allow access to objects with access=no, disabled=yes objects if the user is not disabled=yes. > > according to the wiki, agricultural, forestry, customers etc. are _values_ > for access tags: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Access_tag_values > (agricultural is also a vehicle class though). > > > And some are using disabled as a value too... which was my suggestion .. > see the subject of the thread. > Too me this is a logical extension of the present system of use .. > to me it is not logical, because you either are "disabled" or not, it is like a vehicle class, not a mode you sometimes conform to and sometimes not (like delivery or destination). In other words, it is like "agricultural=*" not like "*=agricultural". > > > "disabled" are a class of users (see "by use"): > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Access_tag_values > > > This is 'documented"? Ha. Look at the page for the 'documentation'. I have > no idea what it is at all.... > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Adisabled > this is a stub, you can find the docu on the page I linked above, or "see also" on this page. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
