Case B: some pics before https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=41.46210902249982&lng=12.874923250143638&z=17&pKey=ygjsHztch9KkrIILOPA3Jg&focus=photo&x=0.49575874366663175&y=0.4652742508751958&zoom=0.3348214285714282
lanes=1, impossible to be estimated:lanes=2 , instead of some itallian driver would try to overtake you for the right. There is no invitation at all, please be clever, be serious, think about all the vehicles that may use some osm app with these values. And also map for the safety of the different kind of drivers. Salut i marques vials yopaseopor On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < [email protected]> wrote: > > > 2018-05-23 8:07 GMT+02:00 José G Moya Y. <[email protected]>: > >> @Martin:I don't want to be a troll, but I feel there is some >> inconsistence between answers in this thread and answers in cycle:lanes >> last week. >> > > > Here are mapillary images for the 2 examples I gave, > Case A, for me lanes=2, unmarked: https://www.mapillary.com/app/ > ?lat=42.199875219999996&lng=12.379584880000039&z=17.080616229522438&pKey= > dxeGLQKJpAKONnVjOyHCuQ&focus=photo&x=0.5039420595168772&y= > 0.5520701196885281&zoom=0 > > Case B which is larger than case A, with 1 lane marked (but effectively 2 > lanes traffic), for which I agree to tag lanes=1 > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=41.45943826996552&lng=12. > 876404262878054&z=17&pKey=r-semo9mp70dR08qELPgYw&focus=photo > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=41.43346094747278&lng=12. > 935902815838062&z=15.827449025905015&pKey=3xxozoDy6nVpc8bd3-d-Fw&focus= > photo > (there's no imagery for the exact spot I mentioned before, the images > demonstrate the way it is built is inviting to use the shoulder) > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
