27. May 2018 12:50 by [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>:
> One of the features in this data is ”berg i dagen”, translated as ”rock > outcrop” on the legend of the printed maps. These areas often overlap forest. > What you typically find on the ground in those cases is sparse pine forest, > where the layer of organic material on the forest floor is so thin that there > are large patches of more or less naked rock between the trees. > > How should these areas be tagged in OSM? Some of them have been imported as > natural=bare_rock overlapping with landuse=forest, but this has led to > protests from persons stating that bare_rock should be used only for areas of > naked rock, with little or no vegetation (and, looking at the Wiki, I can > only agree with them). > I mapped some cases like that manually - based on survey, aerial images and lidar also as natural=bare_rock. I am a bit surprised that it is supposed to be incorrect. I would count "more or less naked rock between the trees" as "with little or no vegetation".
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
