sent from a phone
> On 28. May 2018, at 14:50, Christoph Hormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > But creating two separate geometries to document different properties of > the same real world objects, like the ground conditions in a > wood/forest, is both pretty pointless and against OSM principles. there are no such things as real world objects, it is all just a model of perception of the world, and whether the ground vegetation of a forest is better mapped with a different object as the trees, or together, can not be answered by counting “real world objects”. The “one thing one osm object”- rule is pointless, because the free tagging allows for infinite “things” / ways to look at the world. The answer to primary vs. secondary depends on the question. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
