On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Jo <[email protected]> wrote: > > A few days ago I helped Paul Allen with mapping some bus routes. >
For which, many thanks. I have a few more questions about that route (I'll contact you privately), because it's *weird* > During one of these itineraries, the bus has to do something totally > counterintuitive, twice! > Actually, what the bus does is entirely intuitive. What isn't intuitive is why they planned the route that way in the first place. :) > For the streets where the bus backs up in reverse, I would like to add a > role=reverse. This should not conflict with the recently proposed > role hail-and-ride, as I can't imagine one would be able to board the > vehicle while it's backing up. It will always be on a way that is in the > relation twice, so hail-and-ride can still be set on those ways where the > bus drives forward. > It's strange that you should mention hail and ride. Once it gets out of the town centre, that route does indeed operate as hail and ride. I'm not sure if that is officially condoned by the county council or the bus operator, but that's what the drivers do. But you're right about not conflicting because the segments marked as reverse also have to be traversed in a forward direction so a passenger could board or alight on that segment anyway. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
