It's not about the 'gear'. It's about the vehicle needing to do something that, as far as I'm concerned, is totally unexpected on a bus route. If they put the gear in neutral and had some slaves/volunteers there that pushed the bus backwards (and a supervisor checking they don't run anybody over), the situation would be exactly the same (OK, that would be even more unexpected).
Can we make do without such a role? Sure we can. I wanted to be explicit, rather than implicit. It's not crucial, maybe I should just drop proposing it. Good thing I didn't waste time describing it on the wiki then. Jo 2018-05-29 6:04 GMT+02:00 Jo <[email protected]>: > > > 2018-05-29 1:09 GMT+02:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]>: > >> Could you fool the routers / system by inserting an imaginary >> mini-roundabout at the end of the cul-de-sac? >> >> That way the router would think that the bus drives in, goes round the >> roundabout, then drives out again. >> >> Include a note that the roundabout doesn't actually exist, but is only >> shown for this reason, so that other mappers don't then keep deleting it! >> > > I really fail to see why would have to add data that doesn't exist, > instead of describing exactly what is happening. > > We're talking abtout PT v2. > > This is the route relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/ > 7620346 >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
