IHi! I think bike/charriot/horse/motorbike access should not be taked for granted in bus lanes, as you said.
In my city, bikes are forbidden in bus lanes. They are too narrow to allow a bus overpass a bycicle, and not all bycicles are faster than a bus. In Madrid, bikes should use the rightmost lane that is not a bus lane; if there are more non-bus lanes in the street, leftmost non-bus lane will be considered a 30kph "shared" lane (and the other ones 50kph lanes). Yours, José. El sáb., 9 de junio de 2018 11:14, Neil Matthews <ndmatth...@plus.net> escribió: > I quite often find "access=no", replaced by "motor_vehicle=no" by armchair > editors -- I think they want to make sure that horses can use the bus lanes? > > Neil > > On 08/06/2018 13:18, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2018-06-08 10:44 GMT+02:00 François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com>: > >> >> it's written that dedicated bus lanes should get access=no and I find >> this too restrictive. >> Such lanes can also be accessible by cabs, bikes or by foot. >> It's sounds to be a mean to prevent cars only to take those lanes actually >> > > > for bus _lanes_ access=no will typically make sense, for bus _roads_ (i.e. > only busses allowed on the road, but there might be other non-lanes > included in the highway, like sidewalks) I have sometimes found this > applied by error, because mappers forgot about the pedestrians. > > Cheers, > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging