I was more thinking about the possibility of mapping above ground phone/data cables. Not sure if any of them are strung on what could be considered a “tower” or if it’s always a “pole”…
So while there currently is primarily a power=tower + tower:type=* I could see something like telecom=tower + tower:type=* also showing up at some point. And to keep the possibility open that other types of “towers that hold cables up” are defined in the future, I don’t think tower:type=suspension should automatically imply power=tower if not explicitly tagged as such. From: Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, 24 June 2018 18:16 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Tagging] tower:type=suspension 23. Jun 2018 15:44 by [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> : Not in any way involved with power mapping, but I don’t think tower:type should have necessarily any implications about what it is that’s being transmitted over the suspended cables. I agree, in principle any power:type may be use to transmit any type of power (or not be used at all).
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
