On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 10:40, Colin Smale <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe it's just me, but I really can't understand why landuse for government > functions needs its own tagging. The buildings are often indistinguishable > from commercial properties - what is different is that the occupier is some > statutory organisation.
It would never come to my mind to map the area where the parliament or government meets as landuse=commercial. What kind of services should they sell? Law? :-) > We don't tag landuse=charity, or landuse=private, or landuse=education, so > why landuse=civic_admin? Yes, i do tag landuse=education because there isn't any other land use that fits better -- and apparently others are using it too (currently used 489 times). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
