On 28 September 2018 22:14:03 BST, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > > >Am 28.09.2018 um 18:07 schrieb Bryan Housel: >>> I actually mentioned the issue in Milano. >>> >>> Essentially `traffic_sign`, `traffic_sign:forward` and >>> `traffic_sign:backward` need to be treated as "object" tags as >things >>> are now. >>> >> Let’s just do `traffic_sign=*` and consider the others an unfortunate >> mistake that can go away. >There are a total of 37'000 forward / backward variants that would have >to be migrated to traffic_sign + a suitable sub tag, not an awful lot >in the grand scheme of things, but needs to be done.
Not all give ways have a sign, some are just give way markings painted on the road. Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
