I also support this simplification of definition and tags. Is there a possibility to indicate that a tower is specifically a landmark with a tag of some sort without knowing the height (most of them are not publicly known around here) ? Because some are really useful for navigation (visible from a long way) while other are only visible from up close.
I was personally using the communication_tower tag only to indicate that it is a landmark when it is an especially huge tower (and that was the only difference between a tower and this, to me). Le ven. 5 oct. 2018 à 08:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 16:17, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Sounds sensible to me. If JOSM and ID support man_made=tower + >> tower:type=communication with a preset, it won't be any more work than >> typing in a single tag. >> > > Can confirm that it's preset in iD, as I've just mapped one (a mobile > phone tower) but don't know about JOSM (or anything else)? > > >> Does this require a proposal process? How does something become >> officially deprecated? >> > > Yep, that's the other question! > > Thanks > > Graeme > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
