place=locality and/or type=site I'm not sure it's necessary to create a value to repeat the type of object already present in osm. otherwise it would require a value for each type of object and a value for each type of possible combination between theose types.
Le 07. 10. 18 à 18:07, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > Lest say that we have ngroup of ponds called "Groble", with > > - a water area called "Small Pond" > - a water area called "Big Pond" > > What is the best way to tag this? > > First part for obvious: > > - way with natural=water and name="Small Pond" > - way with natural=water and name="Big Pond" > - relation grouping this ways with name="Groble" and proper type > > But how relation should be tagged? > > Tagging it natural=water seems wrong to me - as result water areas would > be tagged twice. > > But maybe it would be OK? > > If water is supposed to not be tagged twice - maybe use something like > place=water_areas? But it seems not better to me. > > Is there a good way to tag something like that? > > real example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8593489 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
