" If you combine communications;observation, which would it render as?"
It won't render at all, unless an individual renderer adds support for this specific combination On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 8:28 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 08:51, marc marc <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree in principle, but I have a few questions. >> >> Le 09. 10. 18 à 00:32, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit : >> > man_made=tower: a tall, slim, freestanding vertical structure >> > with internal access >> >> if it matches the look, isn't that what would already be >> described by the undocumented building=tower ? >> > > As Francois says, a lattice tower is not a building. & "undocumented" is > also a bit of a problem! I didn't even know such a tag existed & it's not > listed on the map features page > > > create a new tower:type=multipurpose >> >> tower:type=value1;value2 is not enough ? >> > > Could be, but currently man_made:communications_tower renders one way, > tower:type=communications & second way & tower:type=observation a different > way again. If you combine communications;observation, which would it render > as? > > so all support=pole and man-made=pole need >> to be double tagged with the other namespace >> or you see a difference between both ? >> > > Another one that I didn't know of the existence of. The only reference I > could find to pole was power=pole purely for supporting electrical cables. > Somebody else, earlier in this discussion, also made reference to > man_made=pole being undocumented but used for roof-top mobile phone antennae > > Thanks > > Graeme > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
