Le 26. 10. 18 à 00:01, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > if you see crossing=zebra as an alternative tagging for what the wiki > suggests the misleading “uncontrolled”
yes, it's one meaning currently described as "valid in the UK" (crossing=zebra = crossing=uncontrolled + crossing_ref=zebra) But "iD issue" is "load the aerial imagery, look for a zebra" select a node, search for crossing, select "crossing(zebra)" iD add highway=crossing crossing=zebra. upload the changeset. iD never ask you if you known that no traffic light exist. so it may be an alias for crossing=uncontrolled but it may be also mean "crossing=* not requested to the mapper, only the fact that the ground marking is a zebra so don't try to find am advence meaning", the crossing type (light or not) is unknown It's why a just to move "the ground marking is a zebra" out the crossing key. With crossing_ref as currently described on the wiki, a mapper can fill "the ground marking is a zebra" without any "try to guesss if it's uncontrolled or not-filled" "meaning". another 'll see that the crossing=* is not filled and may make a survey or check a street-level imagery to add the missing info. Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
