On 26/10/18 09:44, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
& to throw another spanner in the works :-), what do you call satellite dishes, either bubby ones for home use https://goo.gl/images/qaDzSX or big commercial versions https://goo.gl/images/44ZhNd?

They're certainly not towers, but they definitely are for communication purposes.

Err the first one could be for reception only, so not communication.
They usually receive TV signals. They are fairly frequent in remote areas, and with ex-pats who want to look at their home TV stations.

There is little to distinguish between the reception only and two way communication types.


Thanks

Graeme


On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 07:45, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com <mailto:kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:46 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
    <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        On 25/10/18 23:56, Paul Allen wrote:
        BTW, these days few radio telescopes are dishes.  Most of
        them are phased arrays and not on towers
        or masts.

        That depends on the frequency of operation.

        New dish reflecting ones are being build. They simply perform
        the best for the intended frequencies.


    And there are dishes with phased arrays at the feed point, for
    beam forming, and phased arrays of dishes, for long-baseline
    interferometry.  It all depends on what frequency, SNR,
    polarization and angular resolution you need. Paul is right that
    larger phased arrays are now practicable because of better
    electronics, giving dishes less of an advantage, but phased arrays
    are as old as radio astronomy.



Arrays of  dishes are being used too, over very large distances. But they can also be used individually, so each one needs to be tagged as a separate antenna. Where it is known that they are in some way combined for use then perhaps a relation could be used to signify this.

See Way: Murchison Widefield Array (607964749)
  Tags:
    "antenna"="2048 dual-polarization dipoles"
    "area"="yes"
    "website"="http://www.mwatelescope.org/";
    "man_made"="radio_telescope"
    "name"="Murchison Widefield Array"
    "description"="when combined from each antenna forms a single telescope"
    "frequency"="80 - 300 MHz"

This encompasses the area, but does not link the individual antennas  nor any other infrastructure. Maybe a site relation could be used.


    Jansky built his "merry-go-round" Bruce antenna (20.5 MHz) in
    1932, while Reber didn't build his first dish until 1937. Jocelyn
    Bell discovered pulsars on a phased array built at Cambridge by
    Ryle and Hewish (which also produced the 3C catalog of radio
    sources - including 3C273, the first known quasar).

    The conclusion is either, "Life is full of tradeoffs," or "you
    really don't want to know!"
    _______________________________________________
    Tagging mailing list
    Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to