“One day plots may even be rendered, but I'm not holding my breath.” I’m working on the SQL query right now... but I thought we should discuss this here first.
Re: name=* for plots: I didn’t expect an individual plot to have a name. But if this is possible it should be documented on the wiki page too. On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:59 AM Paul Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 23:46, Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The current wiki page for landuse=allotments >> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments) states >> that one should "Use allotments=plot and/or boundary=lot for an >> individual plot and lot=number_of_plot for number of plot." >> > > It has changed since I looked at it several months ago (or my memory of it > has). I don't > remember boundary=lot or lot=number_of_plot. > > However, the wiki page for allotments=plot >> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:allotments%3Dplot) states >> "You may want to use the ref=* to indicate the number assigned to your >> plot." >> > > That I remember. And found it to be of little value as it didn't render > and wasn't displayed by iD. > > The other interesting fact is that the proposal page for >> > > Ah, the proposal page. Last time I looked it had a link to an example, > created by the > proposer. Which didn't use ref=* but did use name=*. The name IS > displayed by iD, > but isn't rendered. So, for the sake of my sanity, I used name as well as > ref so I could see > what I was doing. > > I should also point out that the name of the plot in the example made it > clear it was a memorial > plot (something like "Fred J Bloggs Memorial Plot"). Using the name of > the person utilizing the > plot would possibly breach data protection legislation. Just saying, for > those tempted to do > that. > > allotments=plot and the wiki page both show this as an "approved" tag, >> however there were 8 opposing votes and only 9 approving votes in the >> 14 day voting period, so it should have been marked as rejected back >> in 2013. Perhaps the status should be changed to "in use", since it is >> used 11,000 times. >> > > Yeah, the proposer was naughty. But it's now a de facto tag anyway and > should be documented > as such. One day plots may even be rendered, but I'm not holding my > breath. > > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
