I think iD might be rendering refs now, unless I misremember. Using ref seems more logical than coming up with a ref replacement just for allotments.
Ant > 7 янв. 2019 г., в 0:37, Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> > написал(а): > > “One day plots may even be rendered, but I'm not holding my breath.” > > I’m working on the SQL query right now... but I thought we should discuss > this here first. > > Re: name=* for plots: I didn’t expect an individual plot to have a name. But > if this is possible it should be documented on the wiki page too. >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:59 AM Paul Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 23:46, Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >> >>> The current wiki page for landuse=allotments >>> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments) states >>> that one should "Use allotments=plot and/or boundary=lot for an >>> individual plot and lot=number_of_plot for number of plot." >> >> It has changed since I looked at it several months ago (or my memory of it >> has). I don't >> remember boundary=lot or lot=number_of_plot. >> >>> However, the wiki page for allotments=plot >>> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:allotments%3Dplot) states >>> "You may want to use the ref=* to indicate the number assigned to your >>> plot." >> >> That I remember. And found it to be of little value as it didn't render and >> wasn't displayed by iD. >> >>> The other interesting fact is that the proposal page for >> >> Ah, the proposal page. Last time I looked it had a link to an example, >> created by the >> proposer. Which didn't use ref=* but did use name=*. The name IS displayed >> by iD, >> but isn't rendered. So, for the sake of my sanity, I used name as well as >> ref so I could see >> what I was doing. >> >> I should also point out that the name of the plot in the example made it >> clear it was a memorial >> plot (something like "Fred J Bloggs Memorial Plot"). Using the name of the >> person utilizing the >> plot would possibly breach data protection legislation. Just saying, for >> those tempted to do >> that. >> >>> allotments=plot and the wiki page both show this as an "approved" tag, >>> however there were 8 opposing votes and only 9 approving votes in the >>> 14 day voting period, so it should have been marked as rejected back >>> in 2013. Perhaps the status should be changed to "in use", since it is >>> used 11,000 times. >> >> Yeah, the proposer was naughty. But it's now a de facto tag anyway and >> should be documented >> as such. One day plots may even be rendered, but I'm not holding my breath. >> >> >> -- >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
