While I was first thinking of brand like Warin, I think this is the better solution. Just as, we do not map the share holders of companies (even when they are other companies) on shops, man_made=works object etc., we typically do not map properties of the operator (besides brand).
m. On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 9:22 AM Topographe Fou <letopographe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Personnaly I don't think I would map umbrella organisations... I would put > operator and operator:wikidata and let Wikidata update partnerships between > associations. It is not a property of the kindergarten, it is a property of > the operator. > > LeTopographeFou > > Message original > De: t.pfei...@computer.org > Envoyé: 7 janvier 2019 11:14 PM > À: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Répondre à: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Objet: Re: [Tagging] Tagging of amenity=kindergarten operated by charitable > operators and organisations > > On 07.01.2019 19:08, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > if it is a religion related operator, I usually also add religion and > > denomination tags, i.e. in > > your Caritas example it would be > > religion=christian > > denomination=catholic > > > > > > I would not be sure how to handle this: > > Are these "access" tags, in the sense that (in the example) the > > kindergarten only accepts Roman > > Catholic children, or is it only indicating the religious background of the > > institution, but they > > accept children with other religious backgrounds as well. > > I have never considered the 'religion' tag as an access tag. Typically I can > freely enter a PoW, and > listen to the ceremony, without being a member of that community or believe > in that religion. > > Similarly, educational institutions in my scope mostly accept children with > different background, in > particular if the receive state funding. E.g. Ireland, the majority of the > schools is operated by > the catholic church, and as a recipient of public funding they have to accept > everybody, equally. > > Back to Konrad's question, any better ideas to tag the name of the operator's > umbrella organisation? > I drafted: > > operator:umbrella=* would be more suitable, or more self-explanatory but > > longer > > operator:umbrella_organisation=* > > tom > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
