On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 07:45, Peter Elderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Analogy is not right. Not tagging all trailheads with this wikipedia > reference, just the specific limited set fitting this specific concept > described on the wikipedia page. > Why would you do this? People keep making analogies to point out to you that this is not a sensible thing to do. And you agree that it is not sensible to link every footpath to a wikipedia page explaining what a footpath is. You agree that is it not sensible to link every bridleway to a wikipedia entry explaining what a bridleway is. You agree that it is not sensible to link every church to a wikipedia page explaining what a church is. The rest of us think that, for the same reasons, it is not sensible to link every TOP to a wikipedia explaining what a TOP is. All you actually need is some form of tag for a TOP. That way, if it's implemented properly, when people use the query tool on the node (which they'd have to do anyway if you persuaded the rest of us to agree with your idea of tagging TOPs with a wikipedia entry), they see a list of tags for the node. Clickable tags and values, which lead to the relevant OSM wiki page defining what the value means. Coming up with a tag for TOPs is the right way to do it. Adding the *same* wikipedia tag to every TOP, as you want to do, is the wrong way to do it. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
