And where do you put the name of the forest/wood ? On the MP or on the outer way ? I would think on the outer way, as the scrub is part of the named area. But then I have an outer way with only a name tag. Is that correct ?
m. On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 8:51 AM Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 23/01/19 18:25, Peter Elderson wrote: > > The rendering itself is a github issue of course, but it shoud be > > based on consistent tagging, which is a tagging list concern. > > > > I slipped up in the contradicting paragraphs... I meant, an area > > landCOVER=grass within a landUSE=forest. > > > > Main point is, let's recognise / support the growing use of the > > landcover key for the three main values: trees, grass and scrub. Then, > > bump the issues with the main renderers and editors. How to do that is > > not for this list, you are absolutely right about that. > > > > Only after that step, rediscuss the landuse key. > > This developed from a simple question of how to map a tree area that has > holes in it of scrub etc. > A fairly simply question? > > The simple answer is to map the tree area as a relation with; > natural=wood (even if not 'natural' as OSM acepts that the key 'natural' > encompass things that many regard as not 'natural'), type multipolygon, > The surrounding closed way with the role outer. > Then place simple closed way/s for the hole/s tagged natural=scrub as > appropriate .. and then place them in the relation with the role 'inner'. > > ------------------------ > The problem came the simple use of the word forest! > > There is no need to wait for other steps to use the tag > landuse=forestry, it does not conflict with 'landcover' or 'natural' > tagging. > Many keys and values are developed in parallel. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
