I strongly dissent with the tone of your mail. Everybody, not only you and the most vocifeferous ones, have the right to express their opinion.
You can dissent, but the tone of your mail is definitely rude and divisive. Think twice. Regards, Sergio On 2019-02-14 12:45, Paul Allen wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 09:13, Ulrich Lamm <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Am 12.02.2019 um 05:59 schrieb [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>: > > Rules according to the interests of commercial exploiters make our > mapping an unpaid labour for some landlords. > That is the opposite of freedom. > > > You have the freedom not to map. Nobody is forcing you to participate in a > project that you > fundamentally disagree with. > > You have the freedom to set up your own alternative to OSM with your own > rules about permissible > imports. If you can justify it within your own tortured logic about > copyright, you can even use the > OSM database as a foundation for your efforts. > > The rest of us have the freedom to set mail filters so your messages go > straight to the bit > bucket, unread. I don't know about others, but that option looks > increasingly tempting to me. > > -- > Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
