On 15/02/2019 12:20, Tobias Wrede wrote:
Unfortunately, the legal situation is not always as clear as we wish
to. There are a lot of grey zones and we need to apply common sense
when tagging the access rules.
You're undoubtedly correct. However, foot=yes/no has always represented,
as stated many times previously & in the wiki, the legality of access.
Here are a few situations where I would not hesitate to put a foot=no
on the road even if there is no corresponding traffic sign.
Pedestrians can take the level footpaths/sidewalks instead taking the
underpass:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6187386#map=18/50.94224/6.95277.
There is no signage forbidding foot traffic.
(https://www.google.de/maps/@50.9444478,6.9530483,3a,60y,190.35h,87.27t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQMNheDoeod1aqNAV9jAkzQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)
For that example you should use another tag & not misappropriate.
Cheers
DaveF
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
