I created https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/17391 <https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/17391> and https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/5991 <https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/5991>
Maybe this is a good idea, maybe it will be implemented and maybe it will help to keep control over situation. Feb 26, 2019, 3:30 PM by [email protected]: > > > Am Di., 26. Feb. 2019 um 14:40 Uhr schrieb Sergio Manzi <> [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> >: > >> ... and not only cycleways: have a look here, where I live: >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/45.4364/12.3334 >> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/45.4364/12.3334> >> >> All are "highway=pedestrian", at the same level, but believe me: they are >> not! >> > > > > Venice is a globally unique (or maybe almost unique) exception anyway, but > what we currently have there is the result of people reclassifying all the > footways as pedestrian roads, even if they are 50 cm wide. I have started in > the past several attempts to open a discussion on this, but it felt like Don > Quixote. See this as an example: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488627565/history > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488627565/history>> I have surveyed it > myself, like many others, where I began to reclassify the very narrow > footpaths from pedestrian to footway, but I am not local and people destroy > the finer grained distinction of footway and pedestrian as soon as you add > them, I guess they do not want the red dots. It is unfortunate, because it > makes the Venice map much harder to read and less useful. If you are local, > please try to improve the situation, we do not need new tags, it would be > sufficient to apply the existing ones consistently rather than > indiscriminately. > > Cheers, > Martin > > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
