Mar 1, 2019, 8:48 PM by [email protected]: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 13:57 Mateusz Konieczny <> [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >> Feb 27, 2019, 7:31 PM by >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> : >> >>> motor_vehicle=no would exclude most emergency vehicles. >>> >> No, it would not. motor_vehicle=no is a legal limitation. >> > > And most emergency vehicles are motor vehicles. > And emergency vehicle are exempt from traffic laws.
>> And if anything, presence of legal motor_vehicle=no may hint >> that motor vehicles would be able to pass it, so it was made illegal >> > > Not necessarily, no. > I know. That is why I use "may hint" not "means", "imply" or something strong. >> To exclude emergency vehicles one should tag physical, not legal >> barriers. >> > > To include motorized emergency vehicles where access=no or motor_vehicle=no, > you need to add emergency=yes. > Explicit tagging that emergency vehicles are exempt from traffic laws seems pointless to me. Adding emergency=yes is useful only where it adds information to mapper or data consumers. I am not going to start spamming it everywhere.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
