On 2019-03-05 10:08, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > On Mon, March 4, 2019 11:20 pm, Warin wrote: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/antenna:use > This is a way to solve most of the problem, but it fails the "map it as I > see it" test. > > man_made=antenna + antenna:reflector=dish does map the satellite > communications antenna I just spotted... But what the naïve mapper I am > really wants is man_made=antenna + antenna=dish (or > monopole/dipole/yagi/helical/phased_array ...) : "map it as I see it" ! > > Then one can add antenna:propagation, antenna:application, > antenna:propagation, antenna:polarisation etc. but they are accessory. > > Am I mistaken in believing that the main tags chain should focus on > offering a straightforward way to map the apparent physical features, > rather than invisible distinctions ? Not that invisible distinctions are > not welcome too - but they should stay out of the way.
+1! As far as I'm concerned, lack of observability and/or lack of verifiability are a no-go for inclusion in OSM! Sergio
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
