Am Mo., 11. März 2019 um 23:29 Uhr schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick < [email protected]>:
> > >> Looking again, there is a category for this with "women;men;children >> <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=women%3Bmen%3Bchildren>" >> 242 times used, "women;men" even has 489. "fashion" is also present with >> 184 uses (0,9%). >> > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/clothes#values >> > > & there's also myriads of men;women;children, women;children;men, > women;babies;children & every other possible combination you could ever > imagine (or create by a typo!) > yes, these exist as possibilities, but in the real world people use "women;men" and "women;men;children". The other combinations are in low numbers. > Yeah, 230k shop=clothes but only 20k of all "types" of clothes combined, > then 7000 =fashion & 15000 =boutique, but from the comments here, you have > to wonder how many of those "boutiques" are actually selling high-level > (very expensive!) clothing? > Not sure what you expect from "boutique". There are shops where a sweat shirt is 1000 Euros and others where it is 100. Both may be "boutiques" but the price differences are significant to most of us ;-) Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
