Mar 16, 2019, 3:53 PM by [email protected]: > Am Sa., 16. März 2019 um 15:09 Uhr schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer <> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >: > >> > On 16. Mar 2019, at 13:11, Jan S <>> [email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > wrote: >> > >> > All other police facilites, that may currently have been tagged >> erroneously as amenity=police would be tagged only as police=*, >> >> >> The „problem“ with this approach is that maps who base the presence of >> objects in their renderings on the presence of specific keys will likely not >> happen to find these police=* things in their database. Depending on how >> relevant the objects are for the specific map, this may be desirable or not. >> Just as a point of consideration. Of course in theory who defines the >> filtering rules for the keys might add „police“, but in practice it takes a >> lot of time to establish a new key as standard. >> >> > Sure, but currently amenity=police is used indiscriminately on many > police-related objects, no matter whether they are important or providing > background services. There are several instances of police barracks or > warehouses mapped as amenity=police, although they clearly don't provide > service to the public. So you basically can't rely on OSM to find a police > station in case of an emergency. I think that's worse than maybe losing some > other police facilities from certain maps. > Some police facilities will remain mistagged, no matter tagging scheme. Have you already fixed such objects or opened OSM notes mentioning mistaggings?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
